r5gnd.netlify.com

Nov 09, 2015  Free Cephalometric Analysis Software Ortho Teacher. Unsubscribe from Ortho Teacher? Cephalometric analysis - Duration: 21:07. Dr Teeth 62,297 views.

1. Tracing Lateral Ceph Application Status
2. Tracing Lateral Ceph Application Pdf
3. Ceph Tracing Software
4. Ceph Tracing Points
5. Tracing Lateral Ceph Application Form

Cephalometric analysis is the clinical application of cephalometry. It is analysis of the dental and skeletal relationships of a human skull.^[1] It is frequently used by dentists, orthodontists, and oral and maxillofacial surgeons as a treatment planning tool.^[2] Two of the more popular methods of analysis used in orthodontology are the Steiner analysis (named after Cecil C. Steiner) and the Downs analysis (named after William B. Downs).^[3] There are other methods as well which are listed below.^[4]

1. “Since CephX introduced their AI driven ceph tracing CT-Dent is able to send back the analysis to the clinician same day, saving time and increasing their efficiency”, continues Kfir Atias. “Knowing that the AI service is backed by CephX highly professional and experienced team gives us peace of mind with our ceph tracings.
2. Feb 04, 2019  Clinical application of cephalometry - Cephalometric analysis. The extraoral projection like the lateral cephalometric technique, requires a complex image receptorcephalometric technique, requires a complex image receptor system that consists of:system that consists of: 1.1. Extraoral filmExtraoral film 2.2. Tracing the soft tissue.

• 1Cephalometric radiographs
• 6Analyses (analytic approaches) by various authors
• 9Superimposition
  • 9.1Structural method

Cephalometric radiographs[edit]

Cephalometric analysis depends on cephalometric radiography to study relationships between bony and soft tissuelandmarks and can be used to diagnose facial growth abnormalities prior to treatment, in the middle of treatment to evaluate progress, or at the conclusion of treatment to ascertain that the goals of treatment have been met.^[5] A Cephalometric radiograph is a radiograph of the head taken in a Cephalometer (Cephalostat) that is a head-holding device introduced in 1931 by Holly Broadbent Sr. in USA.^[6] The Cephalometer is used to obtain standardized and comparable craniofacial images on radiographic films.

Lateral cephalometric radiographs[edit]

Lateral cephalometric radiograph is a radiograph of the head taken with the x-ray beam perpendicular to the patient's sagittal plane. Natural head position is a standardized orientation of the head that is reproducible for each individual and is used as a means of standardization during analysis of dentofacial morphology both for photos and radiographs. The concept of natural head position was introduced by Coenraad Moorrees and M. R Kean in 1958^[7][8] and now is a common method of head orientation for cephalometric radiography.^[9][10]

Registration of the head in its natural position while obtaining a cephalogram has the advantage that an extracranial line (the true vertical or a line perpendicular to that) can be used as a reference line for cephalometric analysis, thus bypassing the difficulties imposed by the biologic variation of intracranial reference lines. True vertical is an external reference line, commonly provided by the image of a free-hanging metal chain on the cephalostat registering on the film or digital cassette during exposure. The true vertical line offers the advantage of no variation (since it is generated by gravity) and is used with radiographs obtained in natural head position.

Posteroanterior (P-A) cephalometric radiograph[edit]

Tracing Lateral Ceph Application Status

A radiograph of the head taken with the x-ray beam perpendicular to the patient’s coronal plane with the x-ray source behind the head and the film cassette in front of the patient’s face.^[11] PA ceph can be evaluated by following analyses that have been developed through the years:

• Grummon analysis
• MSR
• Hewitt analysis
• Svanholt-Solow analysis
• Grayson analysis

Cephalometric tracing[edit]

A Cephalometric tracing is an overlay drawing produced from a cephalometric radiograph by digital means and a computer program or by copying specific outlines from it with a lead pencil onto acetate paper, using an illuminated view-box. Tracings are used to facilitate cephalometric analysis, as well as in superimpositions, to evaluate treatment and growth changes. Historically, tracings of the cephalometric radiographs are done on an 0.003 inch thick matte acetate paper by using a #3 pencil. The process is started by marking three registration crosses on the radiograph which are then transferred to the acetate paper.

Anatomical structures are traced first and some structures are bilateral and have tendency to show up as two separate lines, should have an 'average' line drawn which is represented as a broken line. These landmarks could include inferior border of mandible.

Cephalometric landmarks[edit]

The following are important cephalometric landmarks, which are points of reference serving as datums in measurement and analysis. (Sources: Proffit;^[12] others.)

Landmark points can be joined by lines to form axes, vectors, angles, and planes (a line between 2 points can define a plane by projection). For example, the sella (S) and the nasion (N) are points that together form the sella-nasion line (SN or S-N), which can be projected into the SN plane. A prime symbol (′) usually indicates the point on the skin's surface that corresponds to a given bony landmark (for example, nasion (N) versus skin nasion (N′).

Below is a list of cephalometric planes that are commonly used in different cephalometric analyses.

Classification of analyses[edit]

The basic elements of analysis are angles and distances. Measurements (in degrees or millimetres) may be treated as absolute or relative, or they may be related to each other to express proportional correlations. The various analyses may be grouped into the following:

1. Angular – dealing with angles,
2. Linear – dealing with distances and lengths,
3. Coordinate – involving the Cartesian (X, Y) or even 3-D planes,
4. Arcial – involving the construction of arcs to perform relational analyses.

These in turn may be grouped according to the following concepts on which normal values have been based:

1. Mononormative analyses: averages serve as the norms for these and may be arithmetical (average figures) or geometrical (average tracings). E.g. Bolton Standards.
2. Multinormative: for these a whole series of norms are used, with age and sex taken into account, e.g. Bolton Standards.
3. Correlative: used to assess individual variations of facial structure to establish their mutual relationships, e.g. the Sassouni arcial analysis.

Cephalometric angles[edit]

According to the Steiner analysis:

• ANB (A point, nasion, B point) indicates whether the skeletal relationship between the maxilla and mandible is a normal skeletal class I (+2 degrees), a skeletal Class II (+4 degrees or more), or skeletal class III (0 or negative) relationship.
• SNA (sella, nasion, A point) indicates whether or not the maxilla is normal, prognathic, or retrognathic.
• SNB (sella, nasion, B point) indicates whether or not the mandible is normal, prognathic, or retrognathic.

SNA and SNB is important to determine what type of intervention (on maxilla, mandible or both) is appropriate. These angles, however are influenced also by the vertical height of the face and a possible abnormal positioning of nasion.^[12] By using a comparative set of angles and distances, measurements can be related to one another and to normative values to determine variations in a patient’s facial structure.^[13]

Analyses (analytic approaches) by various authors[edit]

Steiner analysis[edit]

Cecil C. Steiner developed Steiner Analysis in 1953. He used S-N plane as his reference line in comparison to FH plane due to difficulty in identifying the orbitale and porion. Some of the drawbacks of the Steiner analysis includes its reliability on the point nasion. Nasion as a point is known not to be stable due to its growth early in life. Therefore, a posteriorly positioned nasion will increase ANB and more anterior positioned nasion can decrease ANB. In addition, short S-N plane or stepper S-N plane can also lead to greater numbers of SNA, SNB and ANB which may not reflex the true position of the jaws compare to the cranial base. In addition, clockwise rotation of both jaws can increase ANB and counter-clockwise rotation of jaws can decrease ANB.

Wits analysis[edit]

The name Wits is short for Witwatersrand, which is a University in South Africa. Jacobsen in 1975 published an article called 'The Wits appraisal of jaw disharmony'.^[14] This analysis was created as a diagnostic aid to measure the disharmony between the AP degree. The ANB angle can be affected by multitude of environmental factors such as:

1. Patient's age where ANB has tendency to reduced with age
2. Change in position of nasion as pubertal growth takes place
3. Rotational effect of jaws
4. Degree of facial Prognathism

Therefore, it measured the AP positions of the jaw to each other. This analysis calls for 1. Drawing an Occlusal Plane through the overlapping cusps of Molars and Premolars. 2. Draw perpendicular lines connecting A point and B Point to the Occlusal Plane 3. Label the points as AO and BO.^[15]

In his study, Jacobsen mentioned that average jaw relationship is -1mm in Males (AO is behind BO by 1mm) and 0mm in Females (AO and BO coincide). Its clinical significance is that in a Class 2 skeletal patient, AO is located ahead of BO. In skeletal Class 3 patient, BO is located ahead of AO. Therefore, the greater the wits reading, the greater the jaw discrepancy.

Drawbacks to Wits analysis includes:^[16]

• Left and Right molar outlines may not always coincide
• Occlusal plane may differ in mixed vs permanent dentition
• If curve of spee is deep then it may be difficult to create a straight occlusal plane
• Angulation of functional occlusal plane to pterygomaxillary vertical plane was shown to decrease from age 4 to 24.

Downs analysis[edit]

Bjork analysis[edit]

This analysis by Arne Bjork was developed in 1947 based on 322 Swedish boys and 281 conscripts. He introduced a facial polygon which was based on 5 angles and is listed below. Bjork also developed the 7 structural signs which indicates the mandibular rotator type.^[17]

• Nasion Angle - Formed by line connecting ANS to Nasion to Sella
• Saddle or Cranial Base Angle - Formed by line connecting Nasion to Sella to Articulare
• Articular Angle - Formed by line connecting Sella to Articulare to Gonion
• Gonial Angle - Formed by line connecting Articulare to Gonion to Gnathion
• Chin Angle - Formed by line connecting Infradentale to Pogonion to the Mandibular Plane.

Tweed analysis (triangle)[edit]

Charles H. Tweed developed his analysis in the year 1966.^[18] In this analysis, he tried describing the lower incisor position in relation to the basal bone and the face. This is described by 3 planes. He used Frankfurt Horizontal plane as a reference line.^[19][20]

Etap electrical power system analysis software. ETAP is the most comprehensive analysis platform for the design, simulation, operation, and automation of generation, distribution, and industrial power systems. ETAP is developed under an established quality assurance program and is used worldwide as a high impact software. ETAP ® is a full spectrum analytical engineering software company specializing in the analysis, simulation, monitoring, control, optimization, and automation of electrical power systems. ETAP electrical engineering software offers the best and most comprehensive suite of integrated power system enterprise solution. Mar 17, 2019  ETAP is a program designed to help electrical engineers in the processes of designing, simulating, operating and optimizing power systems. The program allows you to perform load flow analysis, short-circuit analysis, motor acceleration analysis, harmonic analysis.

Jarabak analysis[edit]

Analysis developed by Joseph Jarabak in 1972.^[21] The analysis interprets how the craniofacial growth may affect the pre and post treatment dentition. The analysis is based on 5 points: Nasion (Na), Sella (S), Menton (Me), Go (Gonion) and Articulare (Ar). They together make a Polygon on a face when connected with lines. These points are used to study the anterior/posterior facial height relationships and predict the growth pattern in the lower half of the face. Three important angles used in his analysis are: 1. Saddle Angle - Na, S, Ar 2. Articular Angle - S-Ar-Go, 3. Gonial Angle - Ar-Go-Me.

In a patient who has a clockwise growth pattern, the sum of 3 angles will be higher than 396 degrees. The ratio of posterior height (S-Go) to Anterior Height (N-Me) is 56% to 44%. Therefore, a tendency to open bite will occur and a downward, backward growth of mandible will be observed.^[22]

Ricketts analysis[edit]

The Rickett analysis also consists of following measurements

Tracing Lateral Ceph Application Pdf

Sassouni analysis[edit]

This analysis, developed by Viken Sassouni in 1955,^[23][24] states that in a well proportioned face, the following four planes meet at the point O. The point O is located in the posterior cranial base.This method categorized the vertical and the horizontal relationship and the interaction between the vertical proportions of the face.The planes he created are:

1. Supraorbital plane (anterior clenoid to roof of orbits)
2. Palatal plane (ANS-PNS)
3. Occlusal plane (Downs occlusal plane)
4. Mandibular plane (Go-Me)

Ceph Tracing Software

The more parallel the planes, the greater the tendency for deep bite and the more non-parallel they are the greater the tendency for open bite. Using the O as the centre, Sassouni created the following arcs

Blissful Balance is the fifth album in a series of chakra meditations by Susanne Kempken.Duration: 37 minutesAuthor:Delivery: Immediate MP3 Download - WorldwidePrice: $ 9.95All prices are in Australian Dollars (ex GST)Your browser does not support the audio element.Feeling Safe'Feeling Safe' is a guided imagery meditation that will take you on a powerful journey to help you release your fears and improve your confidence. Meditation downloads free mp3. It’s a great meditation for helping to alleviate anxiety. It uses guided relaxation to help soothe you, as well as symbolic visualizations to instill a deeper message of calm inner strength. SHOW MORE GUIDED MEDITATIONS.Aaah.

• Anterior Arc - Arc of a circle between the anterior cranial base and the mandibular plane, with O as the center and O-ANS as the radius.
• Posterior Arc - Arc of a circle between anterior cranial base and mandibular base with O as centre and OSp as radius.
• Basal Arc - From A point should pass through B point
• Midfacial Arc - From Te and should pass tangent to the mesial surface of the maxillary first molar

Harvold analysis[edit]

This analysis was developed by Egil Peter Harvold in 1974.^[25] This analysis developed standards for the unit length of the maxilla and mandible. The difference between the unit length describes the disharmony between the jaws. It is important to know that location of teeth is not taken into account in this analysis.

The maxillary unit length is measured from posterior border of mandibular condyle (Co) to ANS. The mandibular unit length is measured from posterior border of mandibular condyle (Co) to Pogonion. This analysis also looks at the lower facial height which is from upper ANS to Menton.^[26]

McNamara analysis[edit]

COGS analysis (cephalometrics for orthognathic surgery)[edit]

This analysis was developed by Charles J. Burstone when it was presented in 1978 in an issue of AJODO.^[27] This was followed by Soft Tissue Cephalometric Analysis for Orthognathic Surgery in 1980 by Arnette et al.^[28] In this analysis, Burstone et al. used a plane called horizontal plane, which was a constructed of Frankfurt Horizontal Plane.

Computerised cephalometrics[edit]

Computerised cephalometrics is the process of entering cephalometric data in digital format into a computer for cephalometric analysis. Digitization (of radiographs) is the conversion of landmarks on a radiograph or tracing to numerical values on a two- (or three-) dimensional coordinate system, usually for the purpose of computerized cephalometric analysis. The process allows for automatic measurement of landmark relationships. Depending on the software and hardware available, the incorporation of data can be performed by digitizing points on a tracing, by scanning a tracing or a conventional radiograph, or by originally obtaining computerized radiographic images that are already in digital format, instead of conventional radiographs. Computerized cephalometrics offers the advantages of instant analysis; readily available race-, sex- and age-related norms for comparison; as well as ease of soft tissue change and surgical predictions. Computerized cephalometrics has also helped in eliminating any surgeon inadequacies as well as making the process less time consuming.

Digitization[edit]

Computer processing of cephalometric radiographs uses a digitizer. Digitization refers to the process of expressing analog information in a digital form. A digitizer is a computer input device which converts analog information into an electronic equivalent in the computer’s memory. In this treatise and its application to computerized cephalometrics, digitization refers to the resolving of headfilm landmarks into two numeric or digital entities – the X and Y coordinate. 3D analysis would have third quantity - Z coordinate.

Superimposition[edit]

Cephalometric radiographs can be superimposed on each other to see the amount of growth that has taken place in an individual or to visualize the amount of movement of teeth that has happened in the orthodontic treatment. It is important to superimpose the radiograph on a stable anatomical structures. Traditionally, this process has been done by tracing and superimposing on cranial landmarks. One of the most common used methods of superimposing is called the Structural Method.

Structural method[edit]

According to American Board of Orthodontics, this method is based on series of study performed by Arne Bjork,^[29][30]Birte Melsen^[31] and Donald Enlow.^[32] This method divides superimposition in three categories: Cranial base superimposition, maxillary superimposition and mandibular superimposition. Some of the important landmarks in each category is listed below as per the structural method.

Cranial base superimposition[edit]

• The inner contour of the anterior wall of sella turcica
• Walker point
• The anterior contour of the middle cranial fossa
• The contour of the cribriform plate
• Details in the trabecular system in the anterior cranial fossa.
• The contours of the bilateral fronto-ethmoidal crests.
• The cerebral surfaces of the orbital roofs

Mandibular superimposition[edit]

• The anterior contour of the chin
• The inner cortical structure at the inferior border of the mandibular symphysis.
• Trabecular structures in the mandibular symphysis.
• Trabecular structures related to the mandibular canal.
• The lower contour of a molar germ

Ceph Tracing Points

Maxillary superimposition[edit]

• The anterior contour of the zygomatic process

See also[edit]

References[edit]

1. ^Centre for Cancer Education, March 5, 2000
2. ^Cephalometric analysis as a tool for treatment planning and evaluation, European Journal of Orthodontics 1981 3(4):241-245
3. ^Oria, A; Schellino, E; Massaglia, M; Fornengo, B (June 1991). '[A comparative evaluation of Steiner's and McNamara's methods for determining the position of the bone bases]'. Minerva Stomatol. 40 (6): 381–5. PMID1944052.
4. ^Evaluating Ricketts' Cephalometric Analysis as Diagnostic Aid in Black Females, Center For the Study of Human Growth and Development April 5, 2008Archived October 26, 2008, at the Wayback Machine
5. ^Predoctoral Orthodontic Laboratory Manual 2008, Department of Undergraduate Orthodontics, New Jersey Dental School
6. ^US Patent #2032833 by Birdsall H. Broadbent http://www.google.com/patents/US2032833
7. ^Moorrees, Coenraad F. A.; Kean, Martin R. (1958-06-01). 'Natural head position, a basic consideration in the interpretation of cephalometric radiographs'. American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 16 (2): 213–234. doi:10.1002/ajpa.1330160206. ISSN1096-8644.
8. ^Moorrees, Coenraad F.A. (1994-05-01). 'Natural head position—a revival'. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 105 (5): 512–3. doi:10.1016/S0889-5406(94)70014-1. ISSN0889-5406. PMID8166103.
9. ^Weber, Diana W.; Fallis, Drew W.; Packer, Mark D. (2013-05-01). 'Three-dimensional reproducibility of natural head position'. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 143 (5): 738–744. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.11.026. ISSN0889-5406. PMID23631976.
10. ^Bansal, Naveen; Singla, Jeetinder; Gera, Gurmeet; Gupta, Monika; Kaur, Gurpreet (2012). 'Reliability of natural head position in orthodontic diagnosis: A cephalometric study'. Contemporary Clinical Dentistry. 3 (2): 180–183. doi:10.4103/0976-237X.96824. ISSN0976-237X. PMC3425102. PMID22919219.
11. ^Bergman, R. (March 1988). 'Practical applications of the PA cephalometric headfilm'. Orthodontic Review. 2 (2): 20–26. ISSN0895-5034. PMID3269997.
12. ^ ^abProffit, William R. Contemporary Orthodontics, 3rd Edition. C.V. Mosby, 012000. 6.4.2.2.2)
13. ^Dory, Miri (March 13, 2014). 'Cephalometric analysis', Cephx.
14. ^Jacobson, A. (1975-02-01). 'The 'Wits' appraisal of jaw disharmony'. American Journal of Orthodontics. 67 (2): 125–138. doi:10.1016/0002-9416(75)90065-2. ISSN0002-9416. PMID1054214.
15. ^Jacobson, Alex (2009-07-15). 'Update on the Wits Appraisal'. The Angle Orthodontist. 58 (3): 205–19. doi:10.1043/0003-3219(1988)058<0205:uotwa>2.0.co;2 (inactive 2019-08-20). PMID3056122.
16. ^Zawawi, Khalid H. (2012-01-01). 'Comparison of Wits appraisal among different ethnic groups'. Journal of Orthodontic Science. 1 (4): 88–91. doi:10.4103/2278-0203.105874. ISSN2278-1897. PMC4072364. PMID24987633.
17. ^Björk, A. (September 1966). 'Sutural growth of the upper face studied by the implant method'. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica. 24 (2): 109–127. doi:10.3109/00016356609026122. ISSN0001-6357. PMID5225742.
18. ^Greenstein, A. V (1943-09-01). 'The tweed philosophy'. American Journal of Orthodontics and Oral Surgery. 29 (9): 527–540. doi:10.1016/S0096-6347(43)90310-2.
19. ^Cross, J. J. (December 1996). 'The Tweed philosophy: the Tweed years'. Seminars in Orthodontics. 2 (4): 231–236. doi:10.1016/s1073-8746(96)80022-3. ISSN1073-8746. PMID9161293.
20. ^Vaden, J. L. (December 1996). 'The Tweed-Merrifield philosophy'. Seminars in Orthodontics. 2 (4): 237–240. doi:10.1016/s1073-8746(96)80023-5. ISSN1073-8746. PMID9161294.
21. ^Jarabak, Joseph R.; Fizzell, James A. (1972). Technique and treatment with light-wire edgewise appliances. C. V. Mosby Co. ISBN9780801624292.
22. ^Rodriguez-Cardenas, Yalil Augusto; Arriola-Guillen, Luis Ernesto; Flores-Mir, Carlos (2014). 'Björk-Jarabak cephalometric analysis on CBCT synthesized cephalograms with different dentofacial sagittal skeletal patterns'. Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics. 19 (6): 46–53. doi:10.1590/2176-9451.19.6.046-053.oar. ISSN2176-9451. PMC4347410. PMID25628079.
23. ^Sassouni, Viken (1955-10-01). 'A roentgenographic cephalometric analysis of cephalo-facio-dental relationships'. American Journal of Orthodontics. 41 (10): 735–764. doi:10.1016/0002-9416(55)90171-8. ISSN0002-9416.
24. ^Phillips, J. G. (August 1978). 'Photo-cephalometric analysis in treatment planning for surgical correction of facial disharmonies'. Journal of Maxillofacial Surgery. 6 (3): 174–179. doi:10.1016/s0301-0503(78)80087-3. ISSN0301-0503. PMID279635.
25. ^Woodside, Donald G. (1975-09-01). 'The activator in interceptive orthodontics'. American Journal of Orthodontics. 68 (3): 343. doi:10.1016/0002-9416(75)90245-6. ISSN0002-9416.
26. ^Harvold, Egil P. (1974). The activator in interceptive orthodontics. C. V. Mosby Co. ISBN9780801620942.
27. ^Burstone, C. J.; James, R. B.; Legan, H.; Murphy, G. A.; Norton, L. A. (April 1978). 'Cephalometrics for orthognathic surgery'. Journal of Oral Surgery. 36 (4): 269–277. ISSN0022-3255. PMID273073.
28. ^Arnett, G. W.; Jelic, J. S.; Kim, J.; Cummings, D. R.; Beress, A.; Worley, C. M.; Chung, B.; Bergman, R. (September 1999). 'Soft tissue cephalometric analysis: diagnosis and treatment planning of dentofacial deformity'. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 116 (3): 239–253. doi:10.1016/S0889-5406(99)70234-9. ISSN0889-5406. PMID10474095.
29. ^Björk, A.; Skieller, V. (February 1983). 'Normal and abnormal growth of the mandible. A synthesis of longitudinal cephalometric implant studies over a period of 25 years'. European Journal of Orthodontics. 5 (1): 1–46. doi:10.1093/ejo/5.1.1. ISSN0141-5387. PMID6572593.
30. ^Björk, A.; Skieller, V. (April 1977). 'Growth of the maxilla in three dimensions as revealed radiographically by the implant method'. British Journal of Orthodontics. 4 (2): 53–64. doi:10.1179/bjo.4.2.53. ISSN0301-228X. PMID273440.
31. ^'The cranial base: The postnatal development of the cranial base studied histologically on human autopsy material'. American Journal of Orthodontics. 66 (6): 689–691. 1974-12-01. doi:10.1016/S0002-9416(74)90320-0.
32. ^Enlow, Donald H.; Harris, David B. (1964). 'A study of the postnatal growth of the human mandible'. American Journal of Orthodontics. 50 (1): 25–50. doi:10.1016/S0002-9416(64)80016-6. ISSN0002-9416.

Tracing Lateral Ceph Application Form